Recommendations

Recommended structuring (being reached out through #Artists4SocialImprovement):

• The liquid union is registered as a voluntary association (entitled for some tax deduction).
• 5 fields of projects in any liquid union (optionally using their blockchain and other p2p technologies accelerated by their cloud power channels):
  • Consumption channeled by shops,
  • Transportation channeled by lines of car sharing,
  • Housing channeled by law-firms/hostels/social-real-estate
  • Media/education channeled by channels.
  • Banks/insurance/investment of fiat/distributed coins channeled by their cloud power channels,
• Some part of each of the channels of the liquid union is held
  • 51% by the liquid union and
  • 49% by comcom of which (d) is changeable, being a corporate, of which peer owners are the participants in that liquid union.
• The liquid union may become a project, or a channel, in a bigger liquid union.
  • This way, sub populations can be financed and distributed fairly in a growing upward networks.
• Family of projects in one or more liquid unions can be made a social net, as long as the participants are only of one such projects.
  • Such family should be made for recovery of the excluded people being participants, for them to return healthier to their society, being their liquid union.
    • Such people's exclusion is many times made through some specific filters, such as not having, status, work, home, or what other participants have, etc. (yes, some time people are excluded by some rhetoric, such as of the evangelistic "non human" one).
  • This way, people living in their neighborhood could fight against their Destiny of Gentrification,
    • when the people are well organized renters which still have the voting political power to dictate the rules of the economical game, ( and as long as they are not, like the owners of the properties, those who could benefit from the gentrification, together with some real estate manipulators like donald the trump).

Recommended voting:

To better reflect the long will of the voters and to reduce some forgotten dramatic and random argumentation pushed around such votes and to reducing the effect of high turnout of only small/special interest group of voters, being more organized than the other voters, while lowering the general turnout, we can:

• 1. Increase the time between the proposal and the conclusion date (the participation time), being just before turning all announcements to votes and just after counting all the announcements and allow in participation time:
  • 1.1. each voter to announce or change her/his announcement;
  • 1.2. the statistic of the announcements be published and available to all voters.
• 2. Add some more limit conditions for the validation of the proposal in its conclusion date, such that when each limit is not reached, then the vote is canceled, limits such as
  • 2.1. a minimum turnout per vote,
  • 2.2. a limit for tolerance, being the number of changes of announcement per voter together with the limit for the ratio of such tolerance in the vote,